Demand: Changes in the stamp tax will save an average of $ 1.700 for first-time buyers.
Reality check verdict: The average of first-time buyers really are saving around Â£1,700 in stamp duty, but for some people, it is likely that it would be more than offset by the increase in housing prices, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which provides an independent assessment of the Budget. It will likely be better news for potential buyers of time struggling to get together a deposit for those who can’t borrow enough as a result of their earnings.
The chancellor, Philip Hammond, has abolished the stamp duty on houses costing less than 300,000â‚¬, with a reduction of fees of up to Â£ 500,000.
You can read about all the details of the policy with the variations in all of the united kingdom here.
For the first time buyer purchasing a Â£500,000 property, which have previously been paid Â£ 15,000 in the stamp tax, will now pay Â£ 10,000, while someone buying a property ofâ‚¬ 300,000, which would previously have faced a stamp duty bill of Â£ 5,000, pay nothing now.
The chancellor told the BBC that the average saving for first-time buyers would be Â£1,700 – that is the amount of stamp duty that would previously have been payable on the average of the goods bought by first-time buyers, according to Halifax.
But the forecasts from the judgment of the OBR suggest that the benefits would come to the owners and not first-time buyers because house prices are likely to increase by 0.3%. Struggling with deposit
This policy is part of a package of measures designed to help first-time buyers to access the housing market. To understand if it is a good thing, it is useful to think of two fundamental reasons why people might be struggling to buy houses.
One possibility is that people are struggling to get enough money for a deposit. The majority of mortgages require the borrower with a minimum percentage of the purchase price – 5% or 10% for example.
If someone is struggling to get together a deposit, to then be able to spend the Â£ 5,000 that was destined for the tax stamp on the deposit in place, for example, will be helpful and can also increase the amount that you can borrow, which means that you can buy a property that does not have been able to in other circumstances.
The Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS), noted that while home prices might have risen, this type of buyer would end up with a more valuable asset, even if only as a result of the new stamp duty policy.
“The price goes up, but the other is the impact that it has is that it allows first-time buyers the ability to purchase properties that otherwise would not have been able to afford the luxury of,” OBR chairman Robert Chote told the BBC the Daily Politics.The profits too low
Another possibility is that people have saved up their deposit, but their incomes are not high enough for a mortgage provider to be willing to lend them enough money to buy a suitable property.
This policy will not be good for them if the housing prices go up as the OBR suggested. It was said that housing prices could go up by twice as much as the stamp duty savings due to the additional indebtedness possible for some people by having a greater deposit.
The OBR also cited HMRC’s verdict on the similarly of the stamp duty holiday after the financial crisis, which was that it “has not had a significant impact in terms of improving the accessibility of residential property for first-time buyers”.
This point about the rise of prices was put to the chancellor on the program Today, but said that this was looking at the stamp duty change in isolation, without the effect on the market of 300,000 net new households per year that the government plans to build in England in the middle of the next decade.
There has been some doubt about the ability of the government to achieve this objective, not less important of the OBR, which has not modified its forecast for housing starts. He said: “Governments have announced a series of initiatives aimed at overcoming the limitations of the supply of housing”, referring for example to the National Planning Policy Framework 2012 onwards.
Read more Reality Check
Follow us on Twitter