It is the photo that launched a thousand memes. The freshly inaugurated, Donald Trump, surrounded by a crowd of white dudes signing a Directive on the re-establishment of a “global gag rule” ban on US-funded groups around the world, from the debate about abortion.
I saw the news about you on social media, shuddered, donated to planned Parenthood, and then she felt just a little more grateful that I live in Australia, a place where abortion and reproductive rights are not the hysterical hot-button topics in the United States. I have only recently learned that, while we perhaps do not share your poisonous politics of reproductive rights that we have in the past made America’s lead on the implementation of the global gag rule. It was last in Australia in 2009 by Kevin Rudd.
If the Australian Christian Lobby had its way, we would be America’s leadership to follow. They are currently involved in a pretty intense letter-writing campaign calling for the reinstatement of an Australian global gag rule.
What is the “global gag rule”, and why is trump support?
Groups such as the family Planning NSW to call for the funding of auxiliary programs that Can be specially in the Pacific island countries, maintained budget, and with good reason. The Pacific has some of the worst reproductive and sexual health. results in the world with high rates of maternal and infant mortality, unintended and teenage pregnancies, sexual violence and the unacceptable high rates of cervical cancer deaths
At birth for women in the Pacific dying to 34 times the rate of women in Australia. Women in the Pacific dying up to 10 times the rate of women in Australia from cervical cancer. In the development of regions, eight out of 10 women with a curable sexually transmitted infections do not receive treatment. Every two minutes a woman dies in pregnancy or childbirth â€“ most of these deaths are preventable. The main could be the purpose of the global gag rule to stop, the auxiliary organisations, the advice about abortion, but the direct consequence is also, stop, offers a whole range of other services in connection with the sexual and reproductive health.
The human urge to think for a gag rule in this country, you speak for the silent majority of Australians. However, there is no evidence that they do. Numbers from last week’s Essential report, the Australians show strong support for the nation ‘ s commitment to the provision of health services to the women in the Pacific island States.
In fact, 89% of Australians believe it is important for women in the Pacific island countries have access to sexual and reproductive health services such as contraception, early detection of cervical cancer and family planning. A large majority of men (85%) and an even stronger majority of women (91%) support of the Pacific island women’s access to these services. There is very little variation in support between the generations and party affiliation.
How important is it that women in the Pacific island countries have access to sexual and reproductive health services â€“ such as contraception, early detection of cervical cancer and family planning?
On the question of whether our development assistance budget, the provision of these services in these countries, should there is again strong support on gender and generation. This is not a women’s issue, it is relating to a community.
How important is it that Australia, through its foreign budget support to the Pacific island countries, sexual and reproductive health services, including contraception, cervical cancer screening and family planning?
Never mind America, access to abortion is a “nightmare” for many Australians | Van Badham
Finally, on the question of the global gag rule, 67% of Australians (64% of men and 70% women) would be concerned if Australia introduced this rule and stopped help for groups, family planning and sexual and reproductive health services in the Pacific island countries. While the opposition generally highest at the Greens-voters, 62% of coalition voters-the report is concerned about such a move.
How worried you would be if Australia introduced a global gag rule and stopped help for groups, family planning and sexual and reproductive health services in the Pacific island-States?
So much for the silent minority. Only 6% of respondents would be in the basic report is not a gag rule. It is clear, vaccines, maternal health care, family planning and cervical cancer screening in the Pacific island region is the intention of men and women in Australia.
Australians may be fascinated with Donald Trump. You could applaud his recent action in Syria, and some of us perhaps even sympathy for the idea of a ban on Muslim immigration. But the research shows that there is no broad support for a Trump-style gag rule is a right-wing Christian agenda before the health and well-being of Pacific island women.